Näin sitä valtion kanava hoitaa suurvaltasuhteista meidän pakkoveroillamme…
https://areena.yle.fi/1-3491403
Dokun ensimmäinen osakin on vielä nähtävissä. Mutta tämä toinen osa oli pahempi.
Trump esitetään yksikäsitteisesti tunnetun, kiistellyn meediapastorin, -puoskarin ja kirjailijan, ”positiivisen ajattelun” profeetan, American Foundation of Religion and Psychiatry -organisaation perustajan, käännynnäisen (metodismista) predestinaatiokalvinistin, ”menestyk- sen teologin” (sikäläisen ”mersulähetyksen”) johtajan, Manhattanin kal- vinistisen Marmorikirkon pastorin Norman Vincent Pealen (1898 – 1993) opetuslapsena,
VAIKKA SEKÄ TRUMP ITSE ETTÄ MARMORIKIRKKOSEURA- KUNTA OVAT TÄMÄN KIISTÄNEET kerta toisensa jälkeen, kun muut ovat sellaista tuputtaneet!
” Marble has said that though Trump has a longstanding history with the church and that he is a Presbyterian, he is not currently an active member of Marble’s congregation. [5] ”
Norman Peale oli kyllä Trumpin isän ihailema ja tutkima henkilö ja hän on vihkinyt Marmorikirkossa Donaldin tämän ensimmäisen vaimon Ivana Zelníčkován kanssa. Donaldissa hän ihaili tämän maallista menestystä.
Donald oli kuitenkin varhaisteini-ikäisenä Sotilasakatemian oppilaa- na valinnut omasta aloitteesta tuon toisen, huomattavan erilaisen kirkon ja on aina ilmoittanut olleensa TÄHÄN valintaansa tyytyväinen!
Myös Trumpin Presbyteerikirkon nimi tarkoittaa ”sielunhoitajakirkkoa”.
Mutta sen erilaisempaa sielukuvaa tuskin voisi olla kuin calvinisti- sella ja USA:n Presbyteerikirkolla ja sen perustajapatriarkoilla!
http://aamulehdenblogit.ning.com/profiles/blogs/ylen-usa-n-presidenttiehdokkaat-dokumentti-valehteli-h-rskisti
Paavi on sanonut, että hän ei pidä Trumpia kristittynä. Uhkaus rakentaa aita katolisen Meksikon suuntaan (jossa nytkin on hyvin vartioitu raja) ei kuitenkaan riitä tuollaisen ”tuomion” teologiseksi perusteeksi katoli- sessa kirkossa. Sen sijaan monien presbyteerien unitarismi (areiolai- suus, Unitarism, Arianism) pyhän kolminaisuuden kiistäminen, usko pelkkään Pyhään henkeen kyllä riittää (joskaan ei pakota)…
Uusi kaksiosainen dokumentti hahmottaa Hillary Clintonin ja Donald Trumpin henkilökuvaa.
2/2. Millaisen presidentin yhdysvaltalaiset valitsivat? Hillary Clintonin ja Donald Trumpin arvomaailmaa arvioivat heidän työtoverinsa, perheenjäsenet ja poliittiset vastustajat. (U)
Yhdysvaltain presidenttiehdokkaat Hillary Clinton ja Donald Trump jakavat äänestäjien mielipiteitä enemmän kuin ketkään muut ehdokkaat aikaisemmin.
Ulkolinja esittää uunituoreen Clinton vastaan Trump -dokumentin, joka hahmottaa kahden erilaisen kandidaatin henkilökuvaa. Millaisen presidentin amerikkalaiset valitsevat?
Kahdessa osassa nähtävässä dokumentissa katsotaan otsikoiden taakse ja tutkitaan sitä,mikä ehdokkaita on ihmisinä muokannut,mistä he ovat tulleet, miten he johtavat ja miksi he haluavat tulla valituiksi vaikeimpaan kuviteltavissa olevaan työtehtävään.
Ohjelmaa varten on haastateltu kymmeniä ehdokkaat parhaiten tunte- via ihmisiä – ystäviä, perheenjäseniä, neuvonantajia ja vastustajia – sekä myös kirjailijoita, toimittajia ja politiikan sisäpiiriläisiä.
The Choice 2016. Tuotanto: PBS, USA 2016.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump
” Religious views
Trump is a Presbyterian. [561] He has said that he began going to church at the First Presbyterian Church in the Jamaica neighborhood in Queens as a child. [562] Trump attended Sunday school and had his confirmation at that church. [562] In an April 2011 interview on The 700 Club, he commented: ”I’m a Protestant, I’m a Presbyterian. And you know I’ve had a good relationship with the church over the years. I think religion is a wonderful thing. I think my religion is a wonderful religion. ” [563][564]
Trump told a 2015 South Carolina campaign audience he attends Marble Collegiate Church, where he married his first wife Ivana in 1977.
Marble has said that, though Trump has a longstanding history with the church, he is not an active member of Marble. [562]
Trump has said that although he participates in Holy Communion, he has not asked God for forgiveness for his sins. He stated, ”I think if I do something wrong, I think, I just try and make it right. I don’t bring God into that picture.” [565]
Trump calls his own book The Art of the Deal (1987) ”my second favo- rite book of all time,” and has told campaign audiences: ”Do you know what my first is? The Bible! Nothing beats the Bible.”[566][567] De- clining to name his favorite Bible verse, Trump said ”I don’t like giving that out to people that you hardly know.” [562] However, his religious knowledge was questioned after a speech he gave to Liberty Univer- sity, in which he referred to Second Corinthians as ”Two Corinthians,” eliciting chuckles from some in the audience. [568]
Trump maintains relationships with several prominent national Evan- gelical Protes-tant and other Christian leaders, including Tony Perkins and Ralph E. Reed Jr. [569] During his 2016 presidential campaign, he received a blessing from Greek Orthodox priest Emmanuel Lemelson. [570] Trump has ties to the Jewish-American community. [571] At an Algemeiner Journal awards ceremony honoring him with the Algemei- ner Liberty Award, he was asked about having Jewish grandchildren. In reference to daughter Ivanka, who converted to Judaism before her marriage to Jared Kushner, Trump said: ”Not only do I have Jewish grandchildren,I have a Jewish daughter; and I am very honored by that … it wasn’t in the plan but I am very glad it happened.” [572]
Controversy involving the Pope
In February 2016, while on his way home following a visit to Mexico,
Pope Francis said the following when asked about Trump:
A person who thinks only about building walls — wherever they may be — and not building bridges, is not Christian.
…I’d just say that this man [Trump] is not Christian if he said it this way.
…We must see if he said things in that way and in this I give the benefit of the doubt. [573]
Trump responded that it was ”disgraceful” for the Pope to question his faith, suggesting that the Mexican government was ”using the Pope as a pawn” for political purposes, ”because they want to continue to rip off the United States.”[574][575] Trump added that ”if and when” Islamic State attacks the Vatican, the Pope would have ”wished and prayed” Trump were President because under his leadership such an attack would not happen. [575]
The following day, Director of the Holy See Press Office Federico Lom- bardi insisted that the Pope was not launching an attack on Trump nor trying to sway voters by declaring that someone who advocates buil- ding walls isn’t Christian. [576][577] After the clarification by Lombar- di, Trump downplayed his differences with the Pope, saying ”I don’t think this is a fight.” [578] ”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Vincent_Peale
” Norman Vincent Peale (May 31, 1898 – December 24, 1993) was an American minister and author (most notably of The Power of Positive Thinking) and a progenitor of ”positive thinking”.
His ideas were not accepted by mental health experts.[1]”
The Difference Between Donald Trump and Norman Vincent Peale
Early life and education
Peale was born in Bowersville, Ohio, the oldest of three sons of Charles and Anna (née Delaney) Peale. He graduated from Bellefontaine High School, Bellefontaine, Ohio. He earned degrees at Ohio Wesleyan University (where he became a brother of the Fraternity of Phi Gamma Delta) and Boston University School of Theology.
Raised as a Methodist and ordained as a Methodist minister in 1922, Peale changed his religious affiliation to the Reformed Church in America in 1932 and began a 52-year tenure as pastor of Marble Collegiate Church in New York City. During that time the church’s membership grew from about 600 to over 5,000, and he became one of New York City’s most famous preachers.
American Foundation of Religion and Psychiatry
Peale and Smiley Blanton, a psychoanalyst, established a religio-psy- chiatric outpa- tient clinic next door to the church. The two men wrote books together, notably Faith Is the Answer: A Psychiatrist and a Pastor Discuss Your Problems (1940). The book was written in alternating chapters,with Blanton writing one chapter,then Peale.Blanton espoused no particular religious point of view in his chapters. In 1951 this clinic of psychotherapy and religion grew into the American Foundation of Religion and Psychiatry, with Peale serving as president and Blanton as executive director. [2] Blanton handled difficult psychiatric cases and Peale, who had no mental health credentials, handled religious issues. [3]
When Peale came under heavy criticism from the mental health com- munity for his controversial book ”The Power of Positive Thinking,” (1952) Blanton distanced himself from Peale and refused to publicly endorse the book. Blanton did not allow Peale to use his name in ”The Power of Positive Thinking” and declined to defend Peale publicly when he came under criticism. As scholar Donald Meyer describes it: ”Peale evidently imagined that he marched with Blanton in their joint labors in the Religio-psychiatric Institute. This was not exactly so.” [3]: 266 Meyer notes that Blanton’s own book, ”Love or Perish, (1956), ”contrasted so distinctly at so many points with the Peale evangel,” of ”positive thinking” that these works had virtually nothing in common. [3]:273
Radio, television, writing and organizations
In 1935, Peale started a radio program, ”The Art of Living”, which lasted for 54 years. Under sponsorship of the National Council of Churches he moved into television when the new medium arrived. In the meantime he had begun to edit the magazine Guideposts and to write books. His sermons were mailed monthly. [4] During the depression Peale teamed with James Cash Penney, founder of J.C. Penney & Co.; Arthur Godfrey, the radio and TV personality; and Thomas J. Watson, President and Founder of IBM to form the first board of 40Plus, an organization that helps unemployed managers and executives.
In 1945, Peale, his wife Ruth Stafford Peale and Raymond Thornburg, a Pawling, New York businessman, founded Guideposts magazine, a non-denominational forum for celebrities and ordinary people to relate inspi- rational stories. For its launch, they raised US$ 1,200 from Frank Gannett, founder of the Gannett newspaper chain, J. Howard Pew, a Philadelphia industrialist, and Branch Rickey, General Manager of the Brooklyn Dodgers.
Criticism and controversy
Peale’s works came under criticism from several mental health experts, one of whom directly said Peale was a con man and a fraud. [13] These critics appeared in the early 1950s after the publication of The Power of Positive Thinking.
Hard to substantiate
One major criticism of The Power of Positive Thinking is that the book is full of anecdotes that are hard to substantiate. Almost all of the ex- perts and many of the testimonials that Peale quotes as supporting his philosophy are unnamed, unknown and unsourced. Examples include a ”famous psychologist”, [14]:52 a two-page letter from a ”practicing phy- sician”, [14]:150 another ”famous psychologist”, [14]:169 a ”prominent citi- zen of New York City”, [14]:88 and dozens, if not hundreds, more unveri- fiable quotations. Similar scientific studies of questionable validity are also cited. As psychiatrist R. C. Murphy exclaimed, ”All this advertising is vindicated as it were, by a strict cleaving to the side of part truth,” and referred to the work and the quoted material as ”implausible and woodenly pious.” [15]
Concealed hypnosis
A second major accusation of Peale is that he attempted to conceal that his techniques for giving the reader absolute self-confidence and deliverance from suffering are a well known form of hypnosis, and that he attempts to persuade his readers to follow his beliefs through a combination of false evidence and self-hypnosis (auto-suggestion), disguised by the use of terms which may sound more benign from the reader’s point of view (”techniques”, ”formulas,” ”methods,” ”prayers,” and ”prescriptions.”). One author called Peale’s book ”The Bible of American autohypnotism.” [3]:264
While his techniques are not debated by psychologists, Peale said his theo-logical practice and strategy was directed more at self-analysis, forgiveness, character development, and growth [16] much like the Jesuits of the Catholic Church. [17]
Psychiatrist R.C. Murphy writes ”Self knowledge, in Mr. Peale’s under- standing is unequivocally bad: self hypnosis is good.” Murphy adds that repeated hypnosis defeats an individual’s self-motivation, self-know- ledge, unique sense of self, sense of reality, and ability to think critically. Murphy describes Peale’s understanding of the mind as inaccurate, ”without depth,” and his description of the workings of the mind and the unconscious as deceptively simplistic and false: ”It is the very shallowness of his concept of ’person’ that makes his rules appear easy … If the unconscious of man … can be conceptualized as a container for a small number of psychic fragments, then ideas like ’mind-drainage’ follow. So does the reliance on self-hypnosis, which is the cornerstone of Mr. Peale’s philosophy.'” [15]
Psychologist Albert Ellis, the founder of cognitive therapy and influen- tial psychologist of the 20th century,compared the Peale techniques with those of the hypnotist Emile Coue, and Ellis says that the repeated use of these hypnotic techniques could lead to significant mental health problems. Ellis has documented in several books the many indi- viduals he has treated who suffered mental breakdowns from follo- wing Peale’s teachings. Ellis’ writings repeatedly warn the public not to follow the Peale message. Ellis contends the Peale approach is dange- rous, distorted, unrealistic. He compares the black or white view of life that Peale teaches to a psychological disorder (borderline personality disorder), perhaps implying that dangerous mental habits which he sees in the disorder may be brought on by following the teaching. ”In the long run [Peale’s teachings] lead to failure and disillusionment, and not only boome-rang back against people, but often prejudice them against effective therapy.” [18]
(Ellisin omiakaan käsityksiä ei aina voi maailman kestävästi tieteelli- simpinä pitää: hän on mm. sanonut ihmisten olevan ”sitä terveempiä (psyykkisesti), mitä enemmän he harrastavat seksiä”…)
Praise
The Reverend Billy Graham said at the National Council of Churches on June 12, 1966 that ”I don’t know of anyone who had done more for the kingdom of God than Norman and Ruth Peale or have meant any more in my life for the encouragement they have given me.”[31]
Upon hearing of Peale’s death,U.S.President Bill Clinton had this to say: ”The name of Dr. Norman Vincent Peale will forever be associated with the wondrously American values of optimism and service.Dr.Peale was an optimist who believed that, whatever the antagonisms and comp- lexities of modern life brought us, anyone could prevail by approaching life with a simple sense of faith.And he served us by instilling that opti- mism in every Christian and every other person who came in contact with his writings or his hopeful soul. In a productive and giving life that spanned the 20th century, Dr. Peale lifted the spirits of millions and millions of people who were nourished and sustained by his example, his teaching, and his giving. While the Clinton family and all Americans mourn his loss,there is some poetry in his passing on a day when the world celebrates the birth of Christ, an idea that was central to Dr. Peale’s message and Dr. Peale’s work. He will be missed”. [32]
Donald Trump claims to attend Marble Collegiate Church, and Trump has repeatedly praised Peale and cited him as a formative influence, though Peale’s son has said he wishes he would not.[33][34]”
Clintonit ovat siis ylistäneet kyseenalaista mm. hypnoonin systemaatti- sesta väärinkäytöstä ja mielenterveysongelmien AIHEUTTAMISESTA syytettyä ”sielunhoitajaa” suunnattomasti enemmän kuin ihailijanaapurin toisuskoinen poika Donald Trump!
USA:N PRESBYTEERIKIRKON OIKEAT TIEDEMIEHET MUKAAN LUKIEN PAT-RIARKAT VUOSISATOJEN TAKAA OVAT SEN SIJAAN NÄYTTÄNEET NÄRHIN MUNAT ERILAISILLE MUILLE USKONNOLLISILLE JA VALEMATERIALISTISILLE SIELUN- JA MIELENPUOSKAREILLE KATSOMUKSIEN TIETEELLISYYDESSÄ:
Doku väittää valjeellisesti, että Trump olisi puoskareiden talutusnuo- rassa kulkeva puoskareiden hyysääjä, vaikka nimenomaan HILLARY JA BILL OVAT SITÄ TODELLISUUDESSA!
TÄMÄ ANTAA KOKONAAN UUDEN NÄKÖKULMAN USA:N TV-EVANKELISTAINSTITUUTIOON:
http://keskustelu.skepsis.fi/Message/FlatMessageIndex/390631?page=1#390631
”Menetyksen teologia” on osoittautunut USA:n hallitsevien piirien vaali- ansaksi poliitikoille. Tämä on nyt nähty yhdenmukaistetussa Trumpin -vastaisessa propagandassa.
Kyse on muun muassa aikanaan New Yorkin ehkä tunnetuimmasta pa- pista, predestinaatiokalvinistisen (hollantilaiskalvinistisen) Marmori- kirkkoseurakunnan seurakunta- ja TV-papista ja tuomistusta ja vielä useammin syytetystä puoskaripsykologisesta kirjailijasta, metodisti- kirkon poiskäännynnäisestä Norman Vincent Pealesta (1898 – 1993).
…
Clintonit ovat siis ylistäneet kyseenalaista mm. hypnoonin systemaatti- sesta väärinkäytöstä ja mielenterveysongelmien AIHEUTTAMISESTA syytettyä ”sielunhoitajaa” suunnattomasti enemmän kuin ihailijanaapurin toisuskoinen poika Donald Trump! ”
Vitsi on, että nuo ”TV-profeetat” ja kirjailijat olivat haluttuja kavereita poliitikoille, koska he olivat ideologisia auktoriteetteja, jotka vaikuttavat äänestämiseen ja kavereidensakin imagoon.
Jos kuitenkin kyseinen poliitikko joutuu epäsuosioon ja kilpailemaan suosikin kanssa, hänet esitetään höyrähtäneiden uskonympyröiden ohjailemana puoskareiden hyysääjänä!
Trump ei tähän ansaan kuitenkaan mennyt, vaikka Peale on vihkinyt hänet hänen ensimmäisen vaimonsa Ivanan kanssa, ja vaikka Peale oli hänen isänsä kavereita.
Trump ei ole koskaan kuulunut kalvinistiseurakuntaan, vaan hän kuuluu siitä kaukana juuri noissa suhteissa olevaan USA:n Presbyteerikirkoon, joka kyllä on mm. ehtoollisyhteydessä kalvinistisen, anglikaanisen ja kalvinistisen kirkon kanssa.
Kuitenkin juuri tuollainen valehtelu kaadettiin hänen niskaansa kansainvälisessä dokumentissa ehdokkaiden ideologioista.
Tällainen ”tieto” on sellaista, että sitä varsinkaan ulkomailla ei yksinkertaisesti osata epäillä härskiksi huijaukseksi.
Hillary on metodisti ja hän rupesi läpinäkyvästi 2000-luvun alussa puli- noimaan julkisesti uskonasioista, josta minä esimerkiksi tiesin heti, että hän meinaa ruveta presidenttiehdokkaaksi, mutta se oli läpinäkyvää ja hän sai siitä pahasti nenälleen. (Minäkin kirjoitin asiasta nettiin eri pals- toille, pääasiassa lakkautetuille Vapaa-ajattelijoiden, otsikolla ”Sinäkin, Hillary!”. Demokraattien varmana ehdokkaana pidetty Howard Dean myös sekaantui liian hienoihin uskon- ja kirkkosurffeihin, ja hävisi eh- dokkuuden nykyiselle ulkoministeri Kerrylle, joka sitten hävisi Bushille itse vaalin. Tunnettuja Pealen ”ihailijoita” olivat Bushit, jotka ovat anlikaaneja/episkopaaleja.
Trump oli kuitenkin varuillaan, ja löi lujaa rumpua presbyteerisyydes- tään, vaikkei kampanjaansa oikeastaan juuri tavuakaan uskonnollisia asioita sisällyttänytkään.
Mutta myös toisin päin valehdeltiin: että PEALE OLISIKIN OLLUT PRESBYTEERI (jolla nimellä lisäksi KATOLISET usein ”haukkuvat” kaikkia protestantteja).
Näin teki mm. New Yorkin Suomenkielisen luterilaisen seurakunnan pastori Tiina Talvitie YLE:n vaalilähetyksessä!
http://www.finland.org/public/default.aspx?contentid=206796&nodeid=40956&contentlan=1&culture=fi-FI
